Maze alternatives
11 other tools do this job. Which one is right depends on why Maze is not working for you — so start from the reason, not the list.
Why teams leave Maze
- Unmoderated only — you cannot ask a follow-up question.
- Prototype testing measures a happy path, not the messy reality of a live product.
- Bring-your-own-participants works well; the built-in panel is smaller than UserTesting's.
Worth saying: Maze is genuinely strong at this — test a figma prototype with real users before building anything. If that is the part you rely on, switching may cost more than it saves.
If nobody on the team writes code
Maze expects code; these do not.
Everything else in User Research
Ranked by how widely adopted they are. Compare any two to see the differences that matter.
Fast, affordable design testing: five-second tests, first-click, preference, surveys.
Unmoderated tests and live interviews on prototypes and websites, in one tool.
The largest participant network for moderated and unmoderated usability studies.
Ask the question where the behaviour happened: in-product, email, mobile or link.
High-quality participant recruitment for surveys and studies, originally from academia.
Recruitment marketplace: find and pay participants, bring your own research method.
Research repository: store, tag and search every interview your organisation has run.
Information-architecture research: card sorting, tree testing, first-click.
Moderated and unmoderated testing with a global panel and flexible pricing.
End-to-end research operations: recruit, schedule, run, analyse, share.
Not sure which of these fits?
Answer six questions about your stack, team and budget and we will narrow it down for you.
Run the stack finder