Skip to content
testcritic

Useberry vs User Interviews

Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.

Entry price

From €83 per month (billed yearly)

Free tier

From $49 per session (pay-as-you-go; $41 and $36 on annual commitments)

Paid

What drives the bill

The metric that actually scales your invoice.

Only annual prices are published. Growth is €83 a month for 300 responses, one seat and five interviews; Business is €659 for 2,000 responses, five seats and fifty interviews; Enterprise is quoted, from 48,000 responses a year and ten seats. Responses, seats, interviews and transcription hours can be topped up within a plan.

Per-participant recruiting fee plus the incentive you choose. Specialist B2B professionals cost considerably more.

Free tier

Free plan: 10 responses a month, one project, one seat.

Free to manage your own participants; recruitment is pay-per-participant.

Open source

Self-hostable

No-code authoring

Languages

Codeless
Codeless

Platforms

WebiOSAndroid
Web

Fits teams

Solo / side projectStartupScale-up / mid-marketEnterprise
StartupScale-up / mid-marketEnterprise

Adoption

Emerging

Useberry · since 2018

Widely used

User Interviews · since 2015

Strengths

  • Unmoderated tests and moderated interviews in one tool, so interview work needs no second subscription.
  • Card sorting, tree testing and the rest of the method set are included rather than priced as add-ons.
  • Recruit from your own users, Useberry's integrated pool, or through Prolific and Respondent.
  • Solves recruiting, which is the actual bottleneck in most research programmes.
  • Handles incentive payment and scheduling logistics, saving substantial coordinator time.
  • Works with whatever session tooling you already use.

Limitations

  • Interviews are metered — five a month on Growth, fifty on Business.
  • The step from Growth to the next tier is steep: €83 a month to €659.
  • Integrations cover design, recruitment, calendar and meeting tools; there is no issue-tracker or chat handoff.
  • No testing or analysis features — it is recruitment only.
  • Panel is strongest in North America.
  • Costs mount quickly for specialist B2B roles.

Best for

Unmoderated tests and moderated interviews in one tool, from solo researchers to enterprise teams.

Teams whose research is blocked on finding and paying the right participants.

All of these integrate with: Zoom, Google Calendar.

Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.