Matomo vs Amplitude
Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.
Entry price
From $29 per month (Cloud, 50k hits; annual billing gives 2 months free)
Free tierFree tier available
Free tierWhat drives the bill
The metric that actually scales your invoice.
Self-hosting is free but plugins such as heatmaps and A/B testing are paid add-ons. Cloud scales with hits.
Paid plans are quote-based on monthly tracked users and events; enterprise contracts are substantial.
Free tier
Self-hosted Community edition is free forever with unlimited users and hits; premium plugins are paid.
Free plan with a monthly event allowance suitable for early-stage products.
Open source
GPL-3.0
Self-hostable
No-code authoring
Languages
Platforms
Fits teams
Adoption
Widely used
InnoCraft · since 2007
Category standard
Amplitude · since 2012
Strengths
- Complete data ownership with no third-party processing — the strongest GDPR position available.
- No sampling, unlike free tiers of hosted analytics.
- Can be configured to run without cookies or consent banners.
- The deepest retention and cohort analysis in mainstream product analytics.
- Good free tier for early-stage products.
- Strong data-governance tooling for event taxonomy.
Limitations
- Self-hosting requires PHP and MySQL operations, including performance tuning at scale.
- The interface is less refined than modern product analytics tools.
- Advanced features are paid plugins even on the free self-hosted edition.
- Requires deliberate event instrumentation — nothing works without it.
- Enterprise pricing rises steeply with tracked users.
- Replay and experimentation are newer and less mature than the analytics core.
Best for
Public sector, healthcare and European organisations with strict data-residency requirements.
Product teams that need rigorous behavioural analysis over time.
Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.