WebdriverIO vs Selenium WebDriver

Free and open source

Free and open source

Free and open source. You pay in engineering time and CI minutes.

Free and open source. The real cost is grid infrastructure or a device-cloud subscription.

Everything, self-hosted

Everything, self-hosted

Widely used

OpenJS Foundation · since 2015

Category standard

Software Freedom Conservancy · since 2004

• One API for web and native mobile, which is rare and genuinely useful if you ship both.
• Vendor-neutral: swap between local, grid and any device cloud by changing config.
• Mature plugin ecosystem for reporting, visual testing and accessibility.

• The widest language and browser support of anything in the category, including legacy browser versions.
• A W3C standard, so it will outlive any single vendor. Skills transfer between employers.
• Every device cloud speaks Selenium, which keeps you portable between vendors.

• Configuration-heavy compared to Playwright; the wdio.conf.js file becomes a project of its own.
• Inherits WebDriver's flakiness characteristics when used in WebDriver mode.
• Smaller community than Playwright or Cypress, so obscure problems take longer to solve.

• No built-in waiting strategy, reporting, parallelism or assertions — expect to assemble and maintain a framework around it.
• Explicit waits are your problem, and getting them wrong is the number one source of flake in real Selenium suites.
• Out-of-process communication makes it slower than Playwright or Cypress.

JavaScript teams that need one framework covering both web and native mobile.

Enterprises with polyglot teams, legacy browser requirements, or an existing grid investment.