Useberry vs Userlytics
Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.
Entry price
From €83 per month (billed yearly)
Free tierFrom $30 per session (volume/annual rates; platform access from $699/month)
PaidWhat drives the bill
The metric that actually scales your invoice.
Only annual prices are published. Growth is €83 a month for 300 responses, one seat and five interviews; Business is €659 for 2,000 responses, five seats and fifty interviews; Enterprise is quoted, from 48,000 responses a year and ten seats. Responses, seats, interviews and transcription hours can be topped up within a plan.
Two shapes. Buy sessions project-by-project with no subscription (5-session minimum), or take a self-recruitment subscription — Premium $699/month for 5 seats and 50 participants, Advanced from $999/month for 10 seats and unlimited self-recruited participants. Panel sessions go as low as $30 on the Enterprise plan. The per-session option suits intermittent research; the subscriptions only pay off with steady volume.
Free tier
Free plan: 10 responses a month, one project, one seat.
Free trial with a small number of sessions.
Open source
Self-hostable
No-code authoring
Languages
Platforms
Fits teams
Adoption
Emerging
Useberry · since 2018
Established
Userlytics · since 2009
Strengths
- Unmoderated tests and moderated interviews in one tool, so interview work needs no second subscription.
- Card sorting, tree testing and the rest of the method set are included rather than priced as add-ons.
- Recruit from your own users, Useberry's integrated pool, or through Prolific and Respondent.
- Pay-as-you-go avoids an annual commitment for occasional studies.
- Both moderated and unmoderated in one platform.
- Genuinely international panel including many non-English markets.
Limitations
- Interviews are metered — five a month on Growth, fifty on Business.
- The step from Growth to the next tier is steep: €83 a month to €659.
- Integrations cover design, recruitment, calendar and meeting tools; there is no issue-tracker or chat handoff.
- Interface is less polished than the market leaders.
- Analysis tooling is basic compared to UserTesting.
- Panel quality varies by market.
Best for
Unmoderated tests and moderated interviews in one tool, from solo researchers to enterprise teams.
Teams that research a few times a quarter and cannot justify an annual platform contract.
All of these integrate with: Figma.
Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.