Useberry vs Prolific
Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.
Entry price
From €83 per month (billed yearly)
Free tierFrom $8 per participant/hour minimum incentive, plus platform fee
PaidWhat drives the bill
The metric that actually scales your invoice.
Only annual prices are published. Growth is €83 a month for 300 responses, one seat and five interviews; Business is €659 for 2,000 responses, five seats and fifty interviews; Enterprise is quoted, from 48,000 responses a year and ten seats. Responses, seats, interviews and transcription hours can be topped up within a plan.
You set the incentive subject to a fair-pay floor of $8/hour ($12 recommended), then Prolific adds a platform fee — around 42.8% for commercial customers, 33.3% for academic and non-profit. Budget the fee: it is a large fraction, not a rounding error. Still far cheaper than moderated-research platforms.
Free tier
Free plan: 10 responses a month, one project, one seat.
No subscription; pay per participant.
Open source
Self-hostable
No-code authoring
Languages
Platforms
Fits teams
Adoption
Emerging
Useberry · since 2018
Widely used
Prolific · since 2014
Strengths
- Unmoderated tests and moderated interviews in one tool, so interview work needs no second subscription.
- Card sorting, tree testing and the rest of the method set are included rather than priced as add-ons.
- Recruit from your own users, Useberry's integrated pool, or through Prolific and Respondent.
- Notably better data quality than generic survey panels.
- Fine-grained prescreening across hundreds of demographic attributes.
- No subscription — pay only for what you run.
Limitations
- Interviews are metered — five a month on Growth, fifty on Business.
- The step from Growth to the next tier is steep: €83 a month to €659.
- Integrations cover design, recruitment, calendar and meeting tools; there is no issue-tracker or chat handoff.
- Recruitment only; you supply the study and the tooling.
- Skewed towards students and younger, online-native participants.
- Not suited to recruiting senior enterprise decision-makers.
Best for
Unmoderated tests and moderated interviews in one tool, from solo researchers to enterprise teams.
Survey-based and quantitative studies where data quality matters and budget is limited.
Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.