Skip to content
testcritic

Useberry vs Optimal Workshop

Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.

Entry price

From €83 per month (billed yearly)

Free tier

From $199 per month (billed annually, includes 5 launched studies)

Free tier

What drives the bill

The metric that actually scales your invoice.

Only annual prices are published. Growth is €83 a month for 300 responses, one seat and five interviews; Business is €659 for 2,000 responses, five seats and fifty interviews; Enterprise is quoted, from 48,000 responses a year and ten seats. Responses, seats, interviews and transcription hours can be topped up within a plan.

Annual plans reduce the effective monthly rate substantially; recruitment is separate.

Free tier

Free plan: 10 responses a month, one project, one seat.

Free plan with limited participants per study.

Open source

Self-hostable

No-code authoring

Languages

Codeless
Codeless

Platforms

WebiOSAndroid
Web

Fits teams

Solo / side projectStartupScale-up / mid-marketEnterprise
Scale-up / mid-marketEnterprise

Adoption

Emerging

Useberry · since 2018

Established

Optimal Workshop · since 2008

Strengths

  • Unmoderated tests and moderated interviews in one tool, so interview work needs no second subscription.
  • Card sorting, tree testing and the rest of the method set are included rather than priced as add-ons.
  • Recruit from your own users, Useberry's integrated pool, or through Prolific and Respondent.
  • The reference tool for card sorting and tree testing; the analysis visualisations are excellent.
  • Tree testing validates navigation before any build effort is spent.
  • Well-established methodology support and training material.

Limitations

  • Interviews are metered — five a month on Growth, fifty on Business.
  • The step from Growth to the next tier is steep: €83 a month to €659.
  • Integrations cover design, recruitment, calendar and meeting tools; there is no issue-tracker or chat handoff.
  • Narrow scope — it does not do usability testing of interfaces.
  • Expensive per seat for occasional use.
  • Interface is dated in places.

Best for

Unmoderated tests and moderated interviews in one tool, from solo researchers to enterprise teams.

Teams restructuring navigation, taxonomy or content on a large site.

All of these integrate with: Figma.

Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.