Useberry vs Lyssna

From $67 per month (indicative)

From $89 per month (indicative, Basic)

Cheaper than Maze at comparable functionality; participant recruitment is separate.

Panel responses are purchased separately per participant, typically a low single-digit dollar amount for general audiences.

Free plan with limited tests and responses.

Free plan with limited monthly responses.

Emerging

Useberry · since 2018

Established

Lyssna · since 2011

• Good value — most of Maze's capability at a lower price.
• Supports a wide range of prototype sources.
• Card sorting and tree testing included rather than sold separately.

• Extremely fast — a first-click test can be designed, run and answered inside an hour.
• Cheap enough to use for routine design decisions rather than special projects.
• Simple test types that non-researchers can run correctly.

• Smaller company with a lighter integration ecosystem.
• No moderated research.
• Limited built-in panel.

• Narrow: it answers specific comparative questions, not exploratory ones.
• No moderated sessions.
• Panel is general-population; niche B2B audiences are hard to reach.

Small teams that want prototype testing without enterprise pricing.

Design teams that want quick evidence for everyday interface decisions.