Puppeteer vs Katalon Studio

Free and open source

From $84 per seat/month (Professional, billed annually; $184 month-to-month)

Free and open source. You pay in engineering time and CI minutes.

The seat price is only part of it: CI execution needs add-ons priced separately — Runtime Engine at $145/licence/month and cross-browser or mobile device sessions at $158/session/month — so a parallel CI setup costs several times the headline seat figure.

Everything, self-hosted

Free plan covers local authoring and execution for web, mobile and API.

Widely used

Google · since 2017

Widely used

Katalon, Inc. · since 2016

• Small, fast, and very well documented for Chrome-specific work.
• First-class access to the Chrome DevTools protocol for performance tracing and coverage.
• Excellent at non-test jobs: PDF rendering, screenshots, scraping.

• One tool spanning web, API, mobile and desktop, which avoids stitching four frameworks together.
• Manual testers become productive in days rather than months.
• Built-in reporting and test management reduce the number of separate purchases.

• No test runner, assertions, retries or reporting — you assemble all of it.
• Chrome and Firefox only; no WebKit.
• For E2E testing specifically, Playwright is a strict superset. Choose Puppeteer only when you want a minimal automation library.

• Record-and-playback suites become brittle at scale unless someone refactors them into keywords and objects.
• Proprietary project format makes migrating away expensive — real lock-in.
• Heavy desktop IDE; version control and code review are awkward compared to plain-text tests.

Automation jobs that are not tests, or Chrome-only tooling where you want minimal dependencies.

QA teams without dedicated automation engineers that need coverage across several platforms.