Postman vs Hoppscotch

From $9 per user/month (Solo, billed annually)

From $6 per user/month (Organization, billed annually; 25% more monthly)

Postman reorganised its plans: Solo $9, Team $19 and Enterprise $49 per user/month billed annually — the old Basic tier is gone. The free tier is generous for individuals; costs come from collaborator seats and monitoring/mock-call volume.

Self-hosting the community edition is free. The Organization plan adds an admin dashboard and vendor support; the self-hosted Enterprise edition is quote-based.

Free plan for individuals and small teams with limited collection runs, mock calls and monitors.

Free cloud tier and a fully functional self-hosted community edition.

Category standard

Postman, Inc. · since 2012

Established

Hoppscotch · since 2019

• Near-universal adoption — collections are a lingua franca between teams and vendors.
• Covers design, mocking, testing, documentation and monitoring in one place.
• Newman makes any collection runnable in CI without rewriting it.

• Nothing to install — genuinely useful for onboarding and for locked-down machines.
• Self-hosting is a single container, so internal deployment is trivial.
• Very light and fast.

• Cloud-first sync raised real concerns for teams handling sensitive API credentials; the offline story has been repeatedly reduced.
• Collections stored in the vendor cloud rather than your repo make code review and branching awkward.
• The desktop app has grown heavy, and per-seat costs add up on large teams.

• Browser CORS restrictions require a proxy or the desktop agent for many real requests.
• Fewer advanced testing and mocking features than Postman.
• Smaller community.

Teams that want one tool covering the whole API lifecycle and value ecosystem ubiquity.

Teams that want a self-hosted, no-install internal API client.