Playwright vs Cypress
Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.
Entry price
Free and open source
Open sourceFrom $75 per month (Cloud Team, month-to-month; $799/year works out at $67)
Free tierWhat drives the bill
The metric that actually scales your invoice.
Free and open source. Microsoft also sells a hosted parallel-runner service; the library itself has no paid tier.
You only pay for Cypress Cloud. Team is $75 month-to-month or $799/year; Business is $3,199/year. Costs scale with recorded test results, so a large suite on every PR is the expensive shape.
Free tier
Everything, self-hosted
The test runner is free forever. Cypress Cloud free tier covers a limited number of recorded test results per month.
Open source
Apache-2.0
MIT (runner)
Self-hostable
No-code authoring
Languages
Platforms
Fits teams
Adoption
Category standard
Microsoft · since 2020
Category standard
Cypress.io · since 2017
Strengths
- Auto-waiting and web-first assertions remove most of the sleep() flake that plagues older tools.
- The trace viewer — DOM snapshots, network, console and screenshots per step — is the best failure triage in the category.
- True WebKit support, so Safari bugs are caught on Linux CI without a Mac.
- The interactive runner is the best onboarding experience in E2E testing; a new developer writes a passing test in minutes.
- Excellent documentation and one of the largest plugin ecosystems.
- Component testing and E2E in one tool with one config.
Limitations
- No native mobile app support. Mobile means an emulated viewport, not a real device.
- The API surface is large; teams without a conventions document end up with four ways to write the same locator.
- Component testing is still experimental compared to the E2E runner.
- Runs in the same event loop as your app, which historically meant no multi-tab, multi-origin or iframe-heavy testing without workarounds. Support has improved but the model still constrains you.
- JavaScript and TypeScript only.
- Meaningful parallelisation effectively requires paying for Cypress Cloud.
Best for
Teams that write their own tests and want the lowest-flake open-source option available.
Front-end teams who value developer experience and live in a single-origin JavaScript app.
All of these integrate with: GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, CircleCI.
Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.