Skip to content
testcritic

Lyssna vs User Interviews

Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.

Entry price

From $166 per month (Growth, billed annually)

Free tier

From $49 per session (pay-as-you-go; $41 and $36 on annual commitments)

Paid

What drives the bill

The metric that actually scales your invoice.

Growth buys 5 in-depth studies a month, 5 seats and unlimited self-recruited responses. Panel responses are purchased separately per participant, typically a low single-digit dollar amount for general audiences.

Per-participant recruiting fee plus the incentive you choose. Specialist B2B professionals cost considerably more.

Free tier

Free plan: unlimited quick studies, 3 seats and 15 self-recruited responses.

Free to manage your own participants; recruitment is pay-per-participant.

Open source

Self-hostable

No-code authoring

Languages

Codeless
Codeless

Platforms

Web
Web

Fits teams

Solo / side projectStartupScale-up / mid-market
StartupScale-up / mid-marketEnterprise

Adoption

Established

Lyssna · since 2011

Widely used

User Interviews · since 2015

Strengths

  • Extremely fast — a first-click test can be designed, run and answered inside an hour.
  • Cheap enough to use for routine design decisions rather than special projects.
  • Simple test types that non-researchers can run correctly.
  • Solves recruiting, which is the actual bottleneck in most research programmes.
  • Handles incentive payment and scheduling logistics, saving substantial coordinator time.
  • Works with whatever session tooling you already use.

Limitations

  • Narrow: it answers specific comparative questions, not exploratory ones.
  • No moderated sessions.
  • Panel is general-population; niche B2B audiences are hard to reach.
  • No testing or analysis features — it is recruitment only.
  • Panel is strongest in North America.
  • Costs mount quickly for specialist B2B roles.

Best for

Design teams that want quick evidence for everyday interface decisions.

Teams whose research is blocked on finding and paying the right participants.

All of these integrate with: Slack.

Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.