Gatling vs Apache JMeter

From €89 per month (indicative, Enterprise Cloud entry)

Free and open source

Open source is free; Enterprise adds distributed injectors and reporting, billed by virtual-user-hours.

Free. Costs are load-generator infrastructure and, commonly, a cloud execution service such as BlazeMeter.

Gatling open source is complete for single-machine load generation.

Everything, self-hosted

Widely used

Gatling Corp · since 2012

Category standard

Apache Software Foundation · since 1998

• Very high throughput per load generator thanks to the async architecture.
• Code-first scenarios that review, diff and refactor properly.
• The default HTML report is genuinely good enough to hand to a stakeholder.

• Protocol coverage no modern tool matches — JDBC, JMS, LDAP, mainframe-adjacent protocols.
• GUI test-plan building is accessible to testers who do not code.
• Enormous body of documentation, plugins and available expertise.

• Historically Scala-first; the Java and JavaScript DSLs are newer and less documented.
• Fewer protocols than JMeter.
• Distributed load without the enterprise product means building your own orchestration.

• Thread-per-user model is memory-hungry; high load needs a cluster where k6 needs one box.
• JMX test plans are XML that merges terribly in version control.
• The GUI must not be used for actual load generation, which trips up nearly every beginner.

JVM teams wanting code-first performance tests with excellent reporting.

Enterprise performance teams needing protocol breadth and a GUI-based workflow.