Skip to content
testcritic

Biome vs Ruff

Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.

Entry price

Free and open source

Open source

Free and open source

Open source

What drives the bill

The metric that actually scales your invoice.

Free and open source. You pay in engineering time and CI minutes.

Free and open source. You pay in engineering time and CI minutes.

Free tier

Everything, self-hosted

Everything, self-hosted

Open source

MIT

MIT

Self-hostable

No-code authoring

Languages

JavaScriptTypeScript
Python

Platforms

WebAPI
WebAPI

Fits teams

Solo / side projectStartupScale-up / mid-market
Solo / side projectStartupScale-up / mid-marketEnterprise

Adoption

Widely used

Biome / OSS community · since 2023

Category standard

Astral · since 2022

Strengths

  • Dramatically faster than ESLint plus Prettier, which matters on pre-commit hooks.
  • One binary and one config replaces two toolchains.
  • Very good ESLint rule migration tooling.
  • Replaces Flake8, isort, Black, pyupgrade and more with a single fast binary.
  • Fast enough to run on every keystroke in the editor.
  • Straightforward migration from existing Flake8 configurations.

Limitations

  • Rule coverage does not yet match ESLint's plugin ecosystem.
  • No support for framework-specific plugin ecosystems at ESLint's depth.
  • Young project, so expect churn.
  • Not every niche Flake8 plugin rule has been ported.
  • Type checking is a separate concern — you still need mypy or ty.
  • Rapid release cadence occasionally changes behaviour.

Best for

New JavaScript projects and teams frustrated by lint performance.

Every Python project.

All of these integrate with: VS Code, GitHub Actions.

Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.