Visual review as a pull-request check, integrated with your existing E2E suite.
Percy captures DOM snapshots during your existing Cypress, Playwright, Selenium or Storybook runs, renders them on its own infrastructure across widths and browsers, and posts a visual diff as a PR status check. Because it renders server-side from a captured DOM rather than storing raw screenshots, rendering is consistent regardless of the machine that ran the test. BrowserStack owns it.
Best for
From $599 per month (indicative, paid tier)
Free tierFree tier: Free tier with a monthly screenshot allowance suitable for a small project.
What drives the bill: Billed per screenshot. Multiply pages x widths x browsers x commits before committing — this is where budgets are misjudged.
Check current pricing on BrowserStack’s siteFigures are indicative and were last reviewed August 2026. Vendors change pricing often; confirm before you commit.
No reviews of Percy yet. If you have used it in anger, yours would be the first.
If Percy is not the right fit, these solve the same problem differently.
Visual Testing
Visual testing and review built by the Storybook team, for Storybook.
Visual Testing
Visual AI that compares screenshots the way a person would, not pixel by pixel.
Visual Testing
Open-source visual testing with a GitHub-native review experience.
Visual Testing
Open-source visual regression with an optional hosted review platform.