Tricentis Tosca vs Katalon Studio

Quote on request

From $84 per seat/month (Professional, billed annually; $184 month-to-month)

Enterprise licensing only, negotiated annually. Six-figure contracts are normal at scale.

The seat price is only part of it: CI execution needs add-ons priced separately — Runtime Engine at $145/licence/month and cross-browser or mobile device sessions at $158/session/month — so a parallel CI setup costs several times the headline seat figure.

Free plan covers local authoring and execution for web, mobile and API.

Widely used

Tricentis · since 2007

Widely used

Katalon, Inc. · since 2016

• Unmatched coverage of enterprise packaged software, especially SAP end-to-end processes.
• Model-based design means one change updates every affected test case.
• Risk-based prioritisation is a real answer to eight-hour regression packs.

• One tool spanning web, API, mobile and desktop, which avoids stitching four frameworks together.
• Manual testers become productive in days rather than months.
• Built-in reporting and test management reduce the number of separate purchases.

• Expensive, and priced for organisations with a procurement department.
• Steep learning curve; most customers buy consulting alongside the licence.
• Heavy and slow compared to modern code-first tools for plain web applications.

• Record-and-playback suites become brittle at scale unless someone refactors them into keywords and objects.
• Proprietary project format makes migrating away expensive — real lock-in.
• Heavy desktop IDE; version control and code review are awkward compared to plain-text tests.

Large enterprises running SAP or similar packaged systems where no open-source tool reaches.

QA teams without dedicated automation engineers that need coverage across several platforms.