Skip to content
testcritic

Testsigma vs mabl

Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.

Entry price

Free tier available

Free tier

Quote on request

Quote only

What drives the bill

The metric that actually scales your invoice.

Pro and Enterprise cloud plans use custom pricing. Request a quote for your team's platform coverage and execution needs. The community edition is free to self-host, with infrastructure and maintenance managed by your team.

Quote-based, typically sold as an annual contract sized by test runs and users. Expect mid five figures for a team deployment.

Free tier

Apache-2.0 community edition, self-hosted — the GitHub repo is still actively maintained.

14-day free trial.

Open source

Apache-2.0 (community edition)

Self-hostable

No-code authoring

Languages

CodelessJava
CodelessJavaScript

Platforms

WebAPIiOSAndroid
WebAPI

Fits teams

StartupScale-up / mid-marketEnterprise
Scale-up / mid-marketEnterprise

Adoption

Established

Testsigma Inc. · since 2019

Established

mabl · since 2018

Strengths

  • An open-source community edition adds a self-hosted option alongside the managed cloud.
  • Natural-language steps are readable by product owners.
  • Web, mobile and API in one authoring model.
  • Self-healing genuinely reduces maintenance on UIs that change often.
  • Auto-captured visual, performance and accessibility signals on every run without extra setup.
  • Very little infrastructure to own — no grid, no runners.

Limitations

  • Structured natural-language steps use a defined syntax; plan time to learn it during onboarding.
  • The community and cloud editions differ in feature coverage; check the edition against your requirements.
  • Cloud-only. If your application is not reachable from mabl's infrastructure, the setup gets complicated.
  • Complex conditional logic hits the ceiling of the low-code model.
  • Opaque pricing and a substantial minimum commitment.

Best for

QA teams that want readable web, mobile and API automation, with a choice of managed cloud or self-hosted deployment.

Mid-market teams that want broad automated coverage without hiring an automation team.

All of these integrate with: Jira, Jenkins, Slack.

Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.