TestingBot vs Perfecto
Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.
Entry price
From €20 per month (Live, billed annually; €30 month-to-month)
PaidQuote on request
Quote onlyWhat drives the bill
The metric that actually scales your invoice.
Simple, published per-parallel-session pricing; generally cheaper than the market leaders.
Enterprise quote-based licensing by concurrent sessions.
Free tier
Free trial with limited minutes.
Free trial.
Open source
Self-hostable
No-code authoring
Languages
Platforms
Fits teams
Adoption
Emerging
TestingBot · since 2012
Established
Perforce · since 2006
Strengths
- Transparent pricing and no enterprise sales process.
- EU-based, which simplifies some data-residency conversations.
- Responsive support relative to company size.
- Real carrier-network testing and biometric support that competitors lack.
- Strong compliance posture for banking and healthcare.
- Deep native mobile framework support beyond Appium.
Limitations
- Smaller device and browser matrix than the leaders.
- Fewer adjacent products — no visual testing or analytics suite.
- Small vendor risk for critical infrastructure.
- Expensive and enterprise-only.
- Complex platform requiring dedicated administration.
- Web-only teams get little value over cheaper clouds.
Best for
European small and mid-sized teams wanting a no-nonsense grid at a fair price.
Regulated enterprises with demanding native mobile testing requirements.
All of these integrate with: Selenium, Appium, Jenkins.
Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.