Skip to content
testcritic

Testim vs Katalon Studio

Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.

Entry price

Quote on request

Quote only

From $84 per seat/month (Professional, billed annually; $184 month-to-month)

Free tier

What drives the bill

The metric that actually scales your invoice.

Quote-based beyond the free tier; priced by annual test runs.

The seat price is only part of it: CI execution needs add-ons priced separately — Runtime Engine at $145/licence/month and cross-browser or mobile device sessions at $158/session/month — so a parallel CI setup costs several times the headline seat figure.

Free tier

Free plan with a limited monthly run allowance.

Free plan covers local authoring and execution for web, mobile and API.

Open source

Self-hostable

No-code authoring

Languages

CodelessJavaScript
CodelessJavaKotlin

Platforms

WebiOSAndroid
WebAPIiOSAndroidDesktop

Fits teams

Scale-up / mid-marketEnterprise
Scale-up / mid-marketEnterprise

Adoption

Established

Tricentis · since 2014

Widely used

Katalon, Inc. · since 2016

Strengths

  • Smart locators handle everyday UI churn well.
  • The escape hatch to real JavaScript keeps complex cases possible.
  • Reusable shared steps keep large recorded suites maintainable.
  • One tool spanning web, API, mobile and desktop, which avoids stitching four frameworks together.
  • Manual testers become productive in days rather than months.
  • Built-in reporting and test management reduce the number of separate purchases.

Limitations

  • Test logic lives in the vendor's cloud rather than your repository, which complicates review and branching.
  • Run-based pricing punishes running the full suite on every commit.
  • Post-acquisition roadmap is bound to the wider Tricentis strategy.
  • Record-and-playback suites become brittle at scale unless someone refactors them into keywords and objects.
  • Proprietary project format makes migrating away expensive — real lock-in.
  • Heavy desktop IDE; version control and code review are awkward compared to plain-text tests.

Best for

Teams with fast-changing UIs that need maintenance to stay low.

QA teams without dedicated automation engineers that need coverage across several platforms.

All of these integrate with: Jira, Jenkins, Slack.

Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.