Testim vs Autify
Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.
Entry price
Quote on request
Quote onlyQuote on request
Quote onlyWhat drives the bill
The metric that actually scales your invoice.
Quote-based beyond the free tier; priced by annual test runs.
Quote-based annual contracts sized by test runs.
Free tier
Free plan with a limited monthly run allowance.
Two-week free trial.
Open source
Self-hostable
No-code authoring
Languages
Platforms
Fits teams
Adoption
Established
Tricentis · since 2014
Emerging
Autify, Inc. · since 2016
Strengths
- Smart locators handle everyday UI churn well.
- The escape hatch to real JavaScript keeps complex cases possible.
- Reusable shared steps keep large recorded suites maintainable.
- Very low barrier to a first working suite — recording plus a managed browser cloud.
- Maintenance burden is genuinely reduced by the self-healing model.
- Covers web and native mobile from one vendor.
Limitations
- Test logic lives in the vendor's cloud rather than your repository, which complicates review and branching.
- Run-based pricing punishes running the full suite on every commit.
- Post-acquisition roadmap is bound to the wider Tricentis strategy.
- No self-hosted option.
- Limited support for complex data-driven scenarios.
- Smaller international presence and support footprint than the US vendors.
Best for
Teams with fast-changing UIs that need maintenance to stay low.
Small QA teams that need automation without an engineering hire.
All of these integrate with: Jira, Jenkins, CircleCI, Slack, TestRail.
Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.