Skip to content
testcritic

SonarQube vs ESLint

Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.

Entry price

From $34 per month (SonarQube Cloud Team, up to 100k lines of code)

Free tier

Free and open source

Open source

What drives the bill

The metric that actually scales your invoice.

SonarQube Cloud Team starts at $34/month for 100k lines of code and scales in LOC increments. Self-managed SonarQube Server (Developer, Enterprise, Data Center) is licensed per instance per year by lines of code, and SonarSource no longer publishes those figures — you have to ask sales. Branch and PR analysis requires a paid edition either way.

Free and open source. You pay in engineering time and CI minutes.

Free tier

Community Build is free and self-hosted; SonarQube Cloud is free for public projects and for private projects up to 50k lines of code.

Everything, self-hosted

Open source

LGPL-3.0 (Community Build)

MIT

Self-hostable

No-code authoring

Languages

JavaJavaScriptTypeScriptPythonC#GoPHPRubyKotlinSwift
JavaScriptTypeScript

Platforms

WebAPIDesktop
WebAPI

Fits teams

StartupScale-up / mid-marketEnterprise
Solo / side projectStartupScale-up / mid-marketEnterprise

Adoption

Category standard

Sonar · since 2007

Category standard

OpenJS Foundation · since 2013

Strengths

  • Clean-as-you-code is the only quality-gate model that reliably works on legacy codebases.
  • Very broad language coverage from one tool and one gate.
  • Self-hosting satisfies organisations that cannot send source code externally.
  • The plugin ecosystem lets you enforce almost any convention as a rule.
  • Autofix handles a large share of findings without human effort.
  • Universal — every JavaScript tool integrates with it.

Limitations

  • Branch and pull-request analysis — the feature most teams actually need — is paid only.
  • Default rule sets are noisy until tuned to the team.
  • Self-hosted instances need real resources and maintenance.
  • Configuration is a real project of its own, and the flat-config migration caused significant churn.
  • Slow on large codebases without caching.
  • Rule sprawl produces bikeshedding unless someone owns the config.

Best for

Polyglot organisations that need one quality gate across every repository.

Every JavaScript and TypeScript project.

All of these integrate with: VS Code.

Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.