Sentry vs Grafana Synthetic Monitoring
Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.
Entry price
From $26 per month (Team plan, indicative)
Free tierFree tier available
Free tierWhat drives the bill
The metric that actually scales your invoice.
Event-volume pricing. A noisy application can consume the quota quickly, so filtering matters.
Cheap if you already run Grafana Cloud; results are plain Prometheus metrics you already know how to use.
Free tier
Free developer plan with a monthly error and replay allowance.
Included in the Grafana Cloud free tier with a monthly check allowance.
Open source
BSL / FSL
Apache-2.0 (agent)
Self-hostable
No-code authoring
Languages
Platforms
Fits teams
Adoption
Category standard
Functional Software (Sentry) · since 2012
Established
Grafana Labs · since 2021
Strengths
- Release and commit attribution tells you which deploy introduced the error, and often who to ask.
- Excellent SDK coverage across essentially every language and framework.
- Self-hosting is genuinely supported for teams that need it.
- Results are Prometheus metrics, so alerting and dashboards use tools you already have.
- Same k6 scripts serve load testing and synthetic monitoring.
- Good free tier within Grafana Cloud.
Limitations
- Event-based pricing punishes noisy applications until you invest in filtering.
- The product has broadened a lot; some newer modules are shallower than the error core.
- Self-hosting is resource-hungry.
- Assumes you are in the Grafana ecosystem; standalone it makes little sense.
- Browser checks are less mature than Datadog's or Checkly's.
- Fewer probe locations than the dedicated vendors.
Best for
Essentially every engineering team — error tracking is the highest-value monitoring you can add first.
Teams already running Grafana Cloud and k6.
All of these integrate with: Slack, PagerDuty.
Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.