Reflect vs mabl

From $99 per month (indicative entry plan)

Quote on request

Priced by test runs and concurrency; entry plans suit small suites.

Quote-based, typically sold as an annual contract sized by test runs and users. Expect mid five figures for a team deployment.

14-day trial.

14-day free trial.

Emerging

Reflect Software · since 2019

Established

mabl · since 2018

• Nothing to install; a non-technical colleague can record a regression test in ten minutes.
• Handles file uploads, iframes and email verification, which trip up many no-code tools.
• Transparent published pricing, which is rare in this segment.

• Self-healing genuinely reduces maintenance on UIs that change often.
• Auto-captured visual, performance and accessibility signals on every run without extra setup.
• Very little infrastructure to own — no grid, no runners.

• Cloud-only, so testing a private environment requires network work.
• Not suited to very large suites or heavy conditional logic.
• Small vendor — check longevity if this becomes critical infrastructure.

• Cloud-only. If your application is not reachable from mabl's infrastructure, the setup gets complicated.
• Complex conditional logic hits the ceiling of the low-code model.
• Opaque pricing and a substantial minimum commitment.

Startups that need ten critical journeys covered without owning a framework.

Mid-market teams that want broad automated coverage without hiring an automation team.