Perfecto vs TestingBot
Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.
Entry price
Quote on request
Quote onlyFrom €20 per month (Live, billed annually; €30 month-to-month)
PaidWhat drives the bill
The metric that actually scales your invoice.
Enterprise quote-based licensing by concurrent sessions.
Simple, published per-parallel-session pricing; generally cheaper than the market leaders.
Free tier
Free trial.
Free trial with limited minutes.
Open source
Self-hostable
No-code authoring
Languages
Platforms
Fits teams
Adoption
Established
Perforce · since 2006
Emerging
TestingBot · since 2012
Strengths
- Real carrier-network testing and biometric support that competitors lack.
- Strong compliance posture for banking and healthcare.
- Deep native mobile framework support beyond Appium.
- Transparent pricing and no enterprise sales process.
- EU-based, which simplifies some data-residency conversations.
- Responsive support relative to company size.
Limitations
- Expensive and enterprise-only.
- Complex platform requiring dedicated administration.
- Web-only teams get little value over cheaper clouds.
- Smaller device and browser matrix than the leaders.
- Fewer adjacent products — no visual testing or analytics suite.
- Small vendor risk for critical infrastructure.
Best for
Regulated enterprises with demanding native mobile testing requirements.
European small and mid-sized teams wanting a no-nonsense grid at a fair price.
All of these integrate with: Appium, Selenium, Jenkins.
Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.