Optimizely vs Kameleoon
Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.
Entry price
Quote on request
Quote onlyFrom $495 per month (PBX Starter: 10 experiments, 50k tested visitors)
Trial onlyWhat drives the bill
The metric that actually scales your invoice.
Enterprise annual contracts, commonly in the tens of thousands and up. Priced by traffic and modules.
Kameleoon now publishes an entry price. Above Starter it is priced by traffic and modules on a custom quote.
Free tier
No free tier.
30-day trial, no card, up to 3 experiments.
Open source
Self-hostable
No-code authoring
Languages
Platforms
Fits teams
Adoption
Widely used
Optimizely · since 2010
Established
Kameleoon · since 2012
Strengths
- The most capable visual editor for non-technical experiment authoring.
- Deep personalisation and audience-targeting features.
- Established statistics with sequential testing, so peeking is handled correctly.
- Genuinely good hybrid model — the same experiment can run client- and server-side.
- Effective anti-flicker implementation.
- EU hosting with healthcare-grade compliance options.
Limitations
- Expensive, with a suite-oriented sales motion that pushes adjacent products.
- Client-side testing causes flicker and is increasingly blocked by browsers and blockers.
- Heavyweight for teams that only need a handful of experiments.
- Smaller market presence outside Europe.
- Only the entry tier is priced publicly; everything above it is a sales conversation.
- Fewer third-party integrations than Optimizely.
Best for
Large marketing organisations running continuous experimentation on high-traffic sites.
European enterprises needing both marketer and developer experimentation under GDPR.
All of these integrate with: Segment, Google Analytics, Salesforce.
Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.