Leapwork vs mabl
Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.
Entry price
Quote on request
Quote onlyQuote on request
Quote onlyWhat drives the bill
The metric that actually scales your invoice.
Enterprise quote-based licensing, typically annual and sized by concurrent runners plus authoring seats.
Quote-based, typically sold as an annual contract sized by test runs and users. Expect mid five figures for a team deployment.
Free tier
Free trial.
14-day free trial.
Open source
Self-hostable
No-code authoring
Languages
Platforms
Fits teams
Adoption
Emerging
Leapwork · since 2015
Established
mabl · since 2018
Strengths
- Genuinely usable by non-technical staff — the flowchart model is easier than any script-behind-a-recorder approach.
- Covers Citrix, virtual desktop and mainframe environments that most tools cannot touch.
- Doubles as an RPA platform, which can consolidate two budgets.
- Self-healing genuinely reduces maintenance on UIs that change often.
- Auto-captured visual, performance and accessibility signals on every run without extra setup.
- Very little infrastructure to own — no grid, no runners.
Limitations
- Flowcharts do not diff or merge, so version control is essentially unusable.
- Complex logic becomes an unreadable sprawl of blocks.
- Enterprise pricing with no small-team entry point.
- Cloud-only. If your application is not reachable from mabl's infrastructure, the setup gets complicated.
- Complex conditional logic hits the ceiling of the low-code model.
- Opaque pricing and a substantial minimum commitment.
Best for
Enterprises where business users must own automation and Citrix or mainframe is in scope.
Mid-market teams that want broad automated coverage without hiring an automation team.
All of these integrate with: Jira, Azure DevOps, Jenkins.
Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.