Skip to content
testcritic

LaunchDarkly vs GrowthBook

Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.

Entry price

Free tier available

Free tier

From $40 per seat/month (cloud Pro, up to 30 users and 3 projects)

Free tier

What drives the bill

The metric that actually scales your invoice.

LaunchDarkly has dropped per-seat pricing: Developer is free with unlimited seats, and Foundation is pay-as-you-go on service connections and client-side monthly active users with no platform or seat fee. High-traffic consumer products still get expensive, but now through MAU rather than seats. Enterprise is quote-based.

Seat-based rather than usage-based, so cost tracks the number of people using the platform rather than your traffic — which is why it stays dramatically cheaper than the commercial platforms at scale, especially self-hosted.

Free tier

Developer plan is free forever with unlimited seats.

Self-hosted open source is free with unlimited users on 1 project; the cloud Starter tier is free for up to 3 users.

Open source

MIT (core)

Self-hostable

No-code authoring

Languages

JavaScriptTypeScriptPythonJavaC#GoRubyPHPSwiftKotlin
JavaScriptTypeScriptPythonJavaC#GoRubyPHPSwiftKotlin

Platforms

WebAPIiOSAndroidDesktop
WebAPIiOSAndroid

Fits teams

Scale-up / mid-marketEnterprise
StartupScale-up / mid-marketEnterprise

Adoption

Category standard

LaunchDarkly · since 2014

Widely used

GrowthBook · since 2021

Strengths

  • Extremely reliable flag delivery with offline fallbacks — this is infrastructure you can trust in the request path.
  • Best-in-class governance: approval workflows, audit logs, role-based access.
  • Code references and stale-flag detection actually help you remove dead flags.
  • Warehouse-native by design — no duplicate event pipeline and no data leaving your control.
  • Self-hosting removes per-user-volume pricing entirely.
  • Both Bayesian and frequentist engines with sequential testing support.

Limitations

  • Still the expensive option once client-side MAU volume is real, even after the move off per-seat pricing.
  • Experimentation is competent but less sophisticated than dedicated statistics platforms.
  • Usage-based billing on service connections and MAU is harder to forecast than a seat count.
  • Requires a working data warehouse and someone who can define metrics in SQL.
  • Self-hosting is operational work you own.
  • Less polished governance and approval tooling than LaunchDarkly.

Best for

Engineering organisations where flags are critical infrastructure and governance is required.

Data-mature teams that already have a warehouse and want to avoid volume-based pricing.

All of these integrate with: Segment, Slack, Snowflake.

Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.