Skip to content
testcritic

Gatling vs Grafana k6

Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.

Entry price

From €89 per month (indicative, Enterprise Cloud entry)

Free tier

From $19 per month (Grafana Cloud Pro platform fee; k6 usage is billed on top)

Free tier

What drives the bill

The metric that actually scales your invoice.

Open source is free; Enterprise adds distributed injectors and reporting, billed by virtual-user-hours.

Self-hosted is free and unlimited. On Grafana Cloud the free tier includes 500 virtual-user-hours a month, then k6 bills from $0.150 per virtual-user-hour on top of the $19 Pro platform fee — the VU-hours, not the platform fee, are where budgets go.

Free tier

Gatling open source is complete for single-machine load generation.

The k6 CLI is fully open source with no virtual-user limits when self-run.

Open source

Apache-2.0

AGPL-3.0

Self-hostable

No-code authoring

Languages

JavaKotlinJavaScriptTypeScript
JavaScriptTypeScript

Platforms

APIWeb
APIWeb

Fits teams

StartupScale-up / mid-marketEnterprise
Solo / side projectStartupScale-up / mid-marketEnterprise

Adoption

Widely used

Gatling Corp · since 2012

Category standard

Grafana Labs · since 2016

Strengths

  • Very high throughput per load generator thanks to the async architecture.
  • Code-first scenarios that review, diff and refactor properly.
  • The default HTML report is genuinely good enough to hand to a stakeholder.
  • Excellent resource efficiency — thousands of virtual users from one modest machine.
  • Thresholds make performance a build gate rather than a report nobody reads.
  • Native Grafana and Prometheus integration ties load results to server-side metrics.

Limitations

  • Historically Scala-first; the Java and JavaScript DSLs are newer and less documented.
  • Fewer protocols than JMeter.
  • Distributed load without the enterprise product means building your own orchestration.
  • The JavaScript runtime is not Node — no npm modules unless bundled, which surprises people.
  • Browser-level load testing exists but is much heavier and less mature than protocol-level testing.
  • Distributed execution requires either the cloud product or your own orchestration.

Best for

JVM teams wanting code-first performance tests with excellent reporting.

Engineering teams that want performance regression tests running in CI.

All of these integrate with: Jenkins, GitHub Actions, Grafana.

Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.