Skip to content
testcritic

Cypress vs Selenium WebDriver

Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.

Entry price

From $75 per month (Cloud Team, month-to-month; $799/year works out at $67)

Free tier

Free and open source

Open source

What drives the bill

The metric that actually scales your invoice.

You only pay for Cypress Cloud. Team is $75 month-to-month or $799/year; Business is $3,199/year. Costs scale with recorded test results, so a large suite on every PR is the expensive shape.

Free and open source. The real cost is grid infrastructure or a device-cloud subscription.

Free tier

The test runner is free forever. Cypress Cloud free tier covers a limited number of recorded test results per month.

Everything, self-hosted

Open source

MIT (runner)

Apache-2.0

Self-hostable

No-code authoring

Languages

JavaScriptTypeScript
JavaPythonC#JavaScriptRubyKotlinTypeScript

Platforms

WebAPI
Web

Fits teams

Solo / side projectStartupScale-up / mid-marketEnterprise
Scale-up / mid-marketEnterprise

Adoption

Category standard

Cypress.io · since 2017

Category standard

Software Freedom Conservancy · since 2004

Strengths

  • The interactive runner is the best onboarding experience in E2E testing; a new developer writes a passing test in minutes.
  • Excellent documentation and one of the largest plugin ecosystems.
  • Component testing and E2E in one tool with one config.
  • The widest language and browser support of anything in the category, including legacy browser versions.
  • A W3C standard, so it will outlive any single vendor. Skills transfer between employers.
  • Every device cloud speaks Selenium, which keeps you portable between vendors.

Limitations

  • Runs in the same event loop as your app, which historically meant no multi-tab, multi-origin or iframe-heavy testing without workarounds. Support has improved but the model still constrains you.
  • JavaScript and TypeScript only.
  • Meaningful parallelisation effectively requires paying for Cypress Cloud.
  • No built-in waiting strategy, reporting, parallelism or assertions — expect to assemble and maintain a framework around it.
  • Explicit waits are your problem, and getting them wrong is the number one source of flake in real Selenium suites.
  • Out-of-process communication makes it slower than Playwright or Cypress.

Best for

Front-end teams who value developer experience and live in a single-origin JavaScript app.

Enterprises with polyglot teams, legacy browser requirements, or an existing grid investment.

All of these integrate with: Jenkins.

Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.