Skip to content
testcritic

Cypress vs Autify

Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.

Entry price

From $75 per month (Cloud Team, month-to-month; $799/year works out at $67)

Free tier

Quote on request

Quote only

What drives the bill

The metric that actually scales your invoice.

You only pay for Cypress Cloud. Team is $75 month-to-month or $799/year; Business is $3,199/year. Costs scale with recorded test results, so a large suite on every PR is the expensive shape.

Quote-based annual contracts sized by test runs.

Free tier

The test runner is free forever. Cypress Cloud free tier covers a limited number of recorded test results per month.

Two-week free trial.

Open source

MIT (runner)

Self-hostable

No-code authoring

Languages

JavaScriptTypeScript
CodelessJavaScript

Platforms

WebAPI
WebiOSAndroid

Fits teams

Solo / side projectStartupScale-up / mid-marketEnterprise
Scale-up / mid-marketEnterprise

Adoption

Category standard

Cypress.io · since 2017

Emerging

Autify, Inc. · since 2016

Strengths

  • The interactive runner is the best onboarding experience in E2E testing; a new developer writes a passing test in minutes.
  • Excellent documentation and one of the largest plugin ecosystems.
  • Component testing and E2E in one tool with one config.
  • Very low barrier to a first working suite — recording plus a managed browser cloud.
  • Maintenance burden is genuinely reduced by the self-healing model.
  • Covers web and native mobile from one vendor.

Limitations

  • Runs in the same event loop as your app, which historically meant no multi-tab, multi-origin or iframe-heavy testing without workarounds. Support has improved but the model still constrains you.
  • JavaScript and TypeScript only.
  • Meaningful parallelisation effectively requires paying for Cypress Cloud.
  • No self-hosted option.
  • Limited support for complex data-driven scenarios.
  • Smaller international presence and support footprint than the US vendors.

Best for

Front-end teams who value developer experience and live in a single-origin JavaScript app.

Small QA teams that need automation without an engineering hire.

All of these integrate with: GitHub Actions, Jenkins, CircleCI, Jira, Slack.

Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.