Skip to content
testcritic

Crazy Egg vs Mixpanel

Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.

Entry price

From $29 per month (annual billing, 5k pageviews)

Trial only

Free tier available

Free tier

What drives the bill

The metric that actually scales your invoice.

Tracked pageviews are the meter, and the entry plan's 5,000 a month is small enough that a modest marketing site outgrows it. Recording and heatmap-report counts are separate caps on the same plan.

Growth now starts at $0 and scales with event volume up to 20M events a month, with the first million free; annual billing saves around $480 a year. Enterprise is quote-based. Event-volume pricing stays generous for early products but climbs with a chatty event schema.

Free tier

Free trial on every plan; no permanently free tier.

Free forever, up to 1M events a month.

Open source

Self-hostable

No-code authoring

Languages

JavaScriptCodeless
JavaScriptTypeScriptPythonJavaSwiftKotlinPHP

Platforms

Web
WebAPIiOSAndroid

Fits teams

Solo / side projectStartupScale-up / mid-market
StartupScale-up / mid-marketEnterprise

Adoption

Established

Crazy Egg · since 2006

Category standard

Mixpanel · since 2009

Strengths

  • Heatmaps, recordings, surveys and A/B testing in one subscription rather than three.
  • The A/B editor is usable by a marketer without an engineer, which is the whole point of buying it.
  • Twenty years of the same product, which is unusual reassurance in this category.
  • Genuinely self-serve — product managers build their own reports without help.
  • Large free tier that carries an early-stage product a long way.
  • Fast query performance on large event volumes.

Limitations

  • Pageview-metered, and pageviews are the thing you least control — a good week of traffic is an overage.
  • Session replay is shallower than FullStory or LogRocket: no console, no network, no error correlation.
  • Web only. There is no mobile SDK.
  • Requires disciplined event instrumentation and naming.
  • Weaker on user-level qualitative investigation than replay tools.
  • Costs scale with event volume, which grows faster than user count.

Best for

Marketing teams that want to see behaviour and act on it in one tool, without an engineer in the loop.

Product teams that want fast, self-serve behavioural reporting.

All of these integrate with: Segment.

Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.