Skip to content
testcritic

Bruno vs Insomnia

Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.

Entry price

From $6 per user/month (Pro, billed annually)

Free tier

From $12 per user/month (Pro; ~17% off billed annually)

Free tier

What drives the bill

The metric that actually scales your invoice.

Bruno has moved off the old one-time Golden Edition to subscriptions: Pro $6 and Ultimate $11 per user/month billed annually, with a 14-day Ultimate trial. The open-source core remains free and fully functional offline.

Free for small teams; Pro lifts the user cap and adds RBAC, and Enterprise at $45 per user/month adds SSO/SCIM and Kong Konnect integration.

Free tier

The open-source app and CLI are free and fully functional offline.

Essentials is free for up to 3 users, including local and cloud projects, CLI and 1,000 mock requests a month.

Open source

MIT (core)

Apache-2.0

Self-hostable

No-code authoring

Languages

JavaScript
JavaScript

Platforms

API
API

Fits teams

Solo / side projectStartupScale-up / mid-marketEnterprise
Solo / side projectStartupScale-up / mid-market

Adoption

Widely used

Bruno Software · since 2023

Widely used

Kong · since 2016

Strengths

  • Collections live in Git, so they diff, branch and review like any other code.
  • Offline-first with no forced account — a genuine compliance advantage.
  • Imports Postman and Insomnia collections, making migration realistic.
  • Noticeably faster and lighter than Postman for everyday request work.
  • Best-in-class GraphQL and gRPC ergonomics.
  • Design-first OpenAPI workflow with linting built in.

Limitations

  • No built-in mock servers or monitoring; it is a client and runner, not a platform.
  • Younger project with a smaller ecosystem and fewer integrations.
  • Team collaboration relies on your Git workflow rather than in-app features.
  • A forced-account change in 2023 damaged trust; check the current model before standardising on it.
  • Test scripting is less capable than Postman's.
  • Smaller ecosystem of shared collections.

Best for

Engineering teams that want API tests versioned alongside the code they test.

Developers who mainly want a fast client with excellent GraphQL support.

All of these integrate with: GitHub Actions, OpenAPI.

Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.