Skip to content
testcritic

Bruno vs Hoppscotch

Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.

Entry price

From $6 per user/month (Pro, billed annually)

Free tier

From $6 per user/month (Organization, billed annually; 25% more monthly)

Free tier

What drives the bill

The metric that actually scales your invoice.

Bruno has moved off the old one-time Golden Edition to subscriptions: Pro $6 and Ultimate $11 per user/month billed annually, with a 14-day Ultimate trial. The open-source core remains free and fully functional offline.

Self-hosting the community edition is free. The Organization plan adds an admin dashboard and vendor support; the self-hosted Enterprise edition is quote-based.

Free tier

The open-source app and CLI are free and fully functional offline.

Free cloud tier and a fully functional self-hosted community edition.

Open source

MIT (core)

MIT

Self-hostable

No-code authoring

Languages

JavaScript
JavaScript

Platforms

API
API

Fits teams

Solo / side projectStartupScale-up / mid-marketEnterprise
Solo / side projectStartupScale-up / mid-market

Adoption

Widely used

Bruno Software · since 2023

Established

Hoppscotch · since 2019

Strengths

  • Collections live in Git, so they diff, branch and review like any other code.
  • Offline-first with no forced account — a genuine compliance advantage.
  • Imports Postman and Insomnia collections, making migration realistic.
  • Nothing to install — genuinely useful for onboarding and for locked-down machines.
  • Self-hosting is a single container, so internal deployment is trivial.
  • Very light and fast.

Limitations

  • No built-in mock servers or monitoring; it is a client and runner, not a platform.
  • Younger project with a smaller ecosystem and fewer integrations.
  • Team collaboration relies on your Git workflow rather than in-app features.
  • Browser CORS restrictions require a proxy or the desktop agent for many real requests.
  • Fewer advanced testing and mocking features than Postman.
  • Smaller community.

Best for

Engineering teams that want API tests versioned alongside the code they test.

Teams that want a self-hosted, no-install internal API client.

All of these integrate with: OpenAPI, Postman import.

Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.