Autify vs Testsigma
Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.
Entry price
Quote on request
Quote onlyFree tier available
Free tierWhat drives the bill
The metric that actually scales your invoice.
Quote-based annual contracts sized by test runs.
Pro and Enterprise cloud plans use custom pricing. Request a quote for your team's platform coverage and execution needs. The community edition is free to self-host, with infrastructure and maintenance managed by your team.
Free tier
Two-week free trial.
Apache-2.0 community edition, self-hosted — the GitHub repo is still actively maintained.
Open source
Apache-2.0 (community edition)
Self-hostable
No-code authoring
Languages
Platforms
Fits teams
Adoption
Emerging
Autify, Inc. · since 2016
Established
Testsigma Inc. · since 2019
Strengths
- Very low barrier to a first working suite — recording plus a managed browser cloud.
- Maintenance burden is genuinely reduced by the self-healing model.
- Covers web and native mobile from one vendor.
- An open-source community edition adds a self-hosted option alongside the managed cloud.
- Natural-language steps are readable by product owners.
- Web, mobile and API in one authoring model.
Limitations
- No self-hosted option.
- Limited support for complex data-driven scenarios.
- Smaller international presence and support footprint than the US vendors.
- Structured natural-language steps use a defined syntax; plan time to learn it during onboarding.
- The community and cloud editions differ in feature coverage; check the edition against your requirements.
Best for
Small QA teams that need automation without an engineering hire.
QA teams that want readable web, mobile and API automation, with a choice of managed cloud or self-hosted deployment.
All of these integrate with: Jira, Slack, Jenkins, GitHub Actions.
Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.