Allure TestOps vs Testiny
Feature checklists rarely decide anything. What decides it is the pricing metric, who has to write the tests, and which limitation you can live with.
Entry price
From $39 per user/month (volume pricing for larger teams)
Free tierFrom $18.5 per user/month (Starter, up to 25 users; viewers $3.70)
Free tierWhat drives the bill
The metric that actually scales your invoice.
Self-hosted and cloud options; the underlying Allure Report remains free open source.
Prices are published in USD: Starter $18.50 per user/month up to 25 users, Business $20.50 and Enterprise $30, with read-only viewer seats at $3.70. Testiny Server is from $300 per user/year in 5-user packages. EU-hosted with an on-premise option.
Free tier
Free tier for small teams; Allure Report itself is open source.
Free for up to 3 users.
Open source
Self-hostable
No-code authoring
Languages
Platforms
Fits teams
Adoption
Established
Qameta Software · since 2019
Emerging
Testiny · since 2022
Strengths
- Best-in-class handling of automated results — live ingestion, history, flakiness tracking.
- Builds on Allure Report, which many teams already generate.
- Self-hosting available for regulated environments.
- EU hosting and self-hosting option simplify GDPR conversations.
- Genuinely quick to set up and learn.
- Fair, transparent pricing.
Limitations
- Manual testing features are weaker than in manual-first tools.
- Requires an existing automation culture to deliver value.
- Smaller vendor and community.
- Small feature set relative to TestRail or Xray.
- Very small vendor.
- Limited third-party ecosystem.
Best for
Automation-heavy teams that want test management shaped around CI rather than manual cases.
European small and mid-sized teams wanting simple test management with local data residency.
All of these integrate with: Jenkins, Jira.
Pricing last reviewed August 2026 and is indicative only — confirm on each vendor’s own page.