Allure TestOps vs Qase

From $39 per user/month (volume pricing for larger teams)

From $35 per user/month (Teams, billed annually; $42 monthly)

Self-hosted and cloud options; the underlying Allure Report remains free open source.

The old Startup tier is gone — it is now Free, Teams and Enterprise. Read-only collaborator seats are $10 each, which keeps the cost down where many people only need to see results.

Free tier for small teams; Allure Report itself is open source.

Free plan aimed at students, hobbyists and non-profits: 2 projects, 500 MB storage, 30-day history.

Established

Qameta Software · since 2019

Established

Qase · since 2018

• Best-in-class handling of automated results — live ingestion, history, flakiness tracking.
• Builds on Allure Report, which many teams already generate.
• Self-hosting available for regulated environments.

• Fast, modern interface that testers actually enjoy using.
• Excellent first-party reporters for Playwright, Cypress, pytest and others.
• Free tier makes evaluation and small-team use realistic.

• Manual testing features are weaker than in manual-first tools.
• Requires an existing automation culture to deliver value.
• Smaller vendor and community.

• Smaller vendor than Idera or SmartBear; enterprise procurement may push back.
• Fewer enterprise compliance features than the incumbents.
• Jira integration is good but not Jira-native.

Automation-heavy teams that want test management shaped around CI rather than manual cases.

Startups and mid-market teams that find TestRail overpriced and dated.